Quantcast
February 3, 2014

Disney changes from Micky Mouse to Mousy Men and Lesbian Women

Print Friendly and PDF

Television boundaries continue to be erased. It’s been disappointing, but not surprising as mainstream programming has embraced full on homosexual kissing and marriage in Scandal, Nashville, The Good Wife, and so many other shows. But now Disney has decided to join the love fest and bow down to the LGBT community. The above episode, of course, starts the excursion by portraying the gay community with two beautiful women in a perfectly well adjusted family with a perfectly well adjusted child. Because, of course, this is perfectly representative of the LGBT lifestyle. All those stats from the Center from Disease Control and National Violence Against Women Survey are just numbers, right? I mean, just because abuse is twice as likely in lesbian relationships and three times as likely in male homosexual relationships, there are no conclusions to be drawn. And even in the half of homosexual relationships without obvious abuse, those children crying out with natural needs of both a mother and father are surely just anecdotal and not representative.

Now let me try this with a little less sarcasm.  We should be loving people by telling them the truth and helping them find healthy relationships and lifestyles, not deceiving another generation with images that misrepresent a lifestyle. Disney now joins the political agenda that puts a pretty face on the sexual deviancy of our culture. The danger of this milestone is that it will not be “discerning” adults watching primetime drama, but the little children of our nation swallowing this propaganda and shaping their view of the world. Vice-president Joe Biden rightly said (I know, confusing that I said Biden and right in the same sentence) Will & Grace did more for the homosexual agenda than anyone. Now it will be Good Luck Charlie influencing a new generation.

Print Friendly and PDF
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Rickster Rickster

    the world is going to end!

  • Rickster Rickster

    why don’t you get a life and mind your own business. your anti gay bias is based upon a book of myth written by bronze age nomads. it is not factual, it is not based on science, it is based on meaningless gibberish from a god who likes his meat well burnt. the last acceptable heresy you have is bashing gays. everything out of your big old book of myth has turned out to be flat out evil. you know, things like OWNING OTHER PEOPLE and castrating your enemies. you need to just give it a rest. your day has passed as it should. as for adoption, STOP GOING TO OTHER COUNTRIES TO ADOPT KIDS INSTEAD OF BUYING AMERICAN AND THEN COMPLAINING ABOUT THE GAYS ADOPTING THE AMERICAN KIDS.

    • Gregory Peterson

      Mostly Iron Age, not Bronze Age…

      • Rickster Rickster

        BRONZE dumb*ss

        • Gregory Peterson

          Some stories have roots in the Bronze age, but they were written down and edited in the Iron age. See the story of Noah’s Ark, for instance, which presumes the existence of ironmongery.

    • Samuel Munson

      Tell me how the Bible is outdated, how is loving your enemies and praying for those who persecute is in any way evil and or meaningless gibberish, how is the Bible not based in science? If you don’t accept that an intelligent designer created the world what do you believe, I have heard many alternatives to intelligent design, none of them have any basis in science, evolution is a religion just like Christianity, in fact to my mind it takes even more faith to believe in evolution then it does Christianity.

      • David Mora

        “How is the Bible not based in science?”
        Seriously? Care to show your scientific basis for claiming the world was spontaneously created in 7 days? Or the scientific basis for fitting either seven or two of every kind of animal on a (by modern standards) quite small boat? Or the scientific basis for resurrection? Or the scientific basis for walking on water? Or the scientific basis for people living for hundreds of years? Or the scientific basis for giants, sea monsters, nephilim, and angels?

        • Samuel Munson

          As to how God created the world in 7 days, he’s God, he’s all powerful, all knowing. and the Ark was not some small boat, and Noah put 7 or two of every species on the ark, not 2 or 7 of every kind. meaning he didn’t put 2 australian shepards and two poodles on the ark, he put two dogs, the differant kinds came later. the same answer that I put for the first question is the same to the one about resurrection, Jesus was God, he was all powerful. same for walking on water. sea monsters were in many cases dinosaurs like the plesiosaurus, there was no word for dinosaurs back then except for monster and dragon. as for giants look at basketball teams today. and if you want more proof on the subject, 8 skeletons of 12 foot tall 6 toed men were found in Minnesota many years ago. giants. God is all powerful, if he had wanted to he could have created the earth in the blink of an eye.

          • David Mora

            Translation: I have no scientific basis for most of those things, so I’m going to invoke “God can do anything” as explanation for some and “I don’t see you giving a better explanation than God’s Magic” and then go off an a philosophical tangent about the existence of morality.

          • Samuel Munson

            Show me scientific evidence as to how the world could have been created with evolution. Show me observable evidence for evolution. There is none. If God exists then the arguments I gave are solid and firm. and the “philosophical tangent” is very relevant to the topic, how could there be universal laws of any type, like the laws of physics and mathematics, if there is no absolute authority? You are assuming that my argument is wrong giving any reason as to why it’s wrong.

          • David Mora

            “Show me scientific evidence as to how the world could have been created with evolution”

            There are literally thousands of scientific studies, articles, and reports evidencing it, available free of charge online or at your local library. The fact that you choose to ignore them does not mean they cease to exist. If you had even the slightest actual interest in learning about them, you would already have done so.

            Your argument is wrong because you are claiming that your argument in based in science, then resort to completely unscientific claims and reasoning to support yourself.

          • mike

            That’s nice dancing around the question David. None of those studies are measurable observable or repeatable, you know “the scientific method.”. Hence they are theories that don’t show anything except make excuses as to why there isn’t measuable observable or repeatable evidence that life could spontaneously generate – tell me the probability of a single strand of DNA coming together randomly…. But since you say this is free and easy to find point me to one scientific peer reviewed article that shows measueable, observable repeatable evidence of a single cell evolving over Billions of year (or less) to a multi-billion celled organism…

          • Rickster Rickster

            there is no such thing as the supernatural

          • Samuel Munson

            What is the basis for your supposition? What conclusive proof do you have that God doesn’t exist? Or is this disbelief just a feeling, with no actual reason behind it. I believe in a God where everything in the Bible has been proven to be historically and scientifically sound. just because something is old doesn’t mean it’s outdated or unsound, assuming that it is wrong because it’s old is wrong is chronological snobbery, meaning it’s fallacious in it’s structure and not logically sound.

    • Shangti

      guess what? your a little faggot bitch….truth hurts you feral little rodent :)

    • Anonymous

      faggot detected

  • Anonymous

    Gays are perverts & pedophiles. They don’t belong around children. PERIOD. Plus due to their promiscuous behavior, it’s no wonder why the CDC states they are at such risks. Plus it depraves a child of a mother or father. 70 years ago, these people would be put into insane asylums. Want to see what happens to kids who grow up without BOTH a mother & father? Go to a prison & look how many prisoners have no mothers or fathers. And liberals want to expose children to this crap?! WTF? Kids need a mother & a father!

    Go back in the closets fa990ts. Nobody likes you.

    I really think it’s time to boycott disney. Torrent their films, stop listening to their music, stop watching ABC & all the other channels they support. Stop going to their parks, stop buying their products. Get em where it hurts! Disney wants to challenge a silent majority (& yes, the majority of us do NOT support homosexuality). Bring it on!